The Three Fears That Quietly Sabotage Our Relationships

Lukeides argues that people carry fewer fears than they think. In her view nearly all of them grow from three evolutionary concerns. The first is a fear of weakness: the worry that body or mind will not cope with illness, stress or strong emotion. People with this core belief often avoid hard feelings, even though much of a fulfilled life comes after passing through difficult periods.

The second fear concerns competence. Early humans needed skills to survive, and today that shows up as a fear of seeming stupid, making mistakes or being criticised at work. This is where imposter syndrome lives. Because ability is tied to earning a living and staying safe, the fear of failing reaches well beyond the office and into how people judge their own worth.

The third fear is about connection, what she calls innate lovability. Am I good enough, likeable enough, desirable enough? These questions start in early relationships, as attachment theory shows, and carry into friendships and romance. She notes that humans thrived through cooperation, not intellect alone, so fears of rejection and social exclusion run deep and shape how people behave with a partner.

The habits people build to stay safe often made sense when they were formed. Lukeides describes a child who spends a first day at preschool alone and concludes that something must be wrong with them. That conclusion becomes an internal algorithm, still predicting decades later that a room full of strangers will not like them, long after the original evidence has expired.

She is clear that this is not a personal fault. The brain is built to make quick predictions so it can stay safe, and caution once served a real purpose. The trouble is that the inputs were faulty, and our interpretations of painful events often hurt more than the events themselves. A belief formed at seven should not decide how an adult approaches love and trust.

Her remedy is gentle questioning rather than force. She suggests turning toward a fear and asking what it is trying to protect you from. In the interview she described the book she was writing, No Parts Left Behind, which grows from this practice. Then come the follow-up questions: when did this belief start, how old is it, and is it still valid today?

Lukeides warns against swinging to the opposite extreme. She compares fear to an oversensitive smoke alarm that sounds every time someone makes toast. It is annoying, but ripping it out would be unwise. Instead she recommends careful experimentation: offering a small piece of self-disclosure, then watching what the other person does with that shared vulnerability before going any further.

She describes healthy closeness as a dance. One person takes a step, the other matches it, and trust builds in turns. Oversharing early can be its own defence, so the aim is gradual and mutual disclosure. She also reminds listeners that no relationship is perfectly safe. Small ruptures are normal, and how someone repairs them reveals whether the relationship is worth keeping.

Speaking up is central to that test. Telling someone what hurts, what you like and what you are ready for is not being difficult or starting an argument. It gives them the road map they need to love you in a way that lands. Her closing advice for dating was simple: play, stay authentic, and remember the other person feels vulnerable too.

“When we raise an issue with someone, we're not becoming problematic.”

Share this

FacebookInstagramLinkedInX